From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044) Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 08:43:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190501005253.12791.10999@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190501005255.2DF9B2042B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="218311"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 07 14:43:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hNzRG-000uhT-Ue for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 14:43:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46202 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNzRF-0006Cm-SA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 08:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNzR7-0006BE-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 08:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNzR6-0007oe-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 08:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:51686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNzR6-0007oX-5C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 08:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x47Ch3bS026947; Tue, 7 May 2019 08:43:04 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2AE2766184; Tue, 7 May 2019 08:43:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Tue, 7 May 2019 06:44:02 -0400") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6540=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6540> : inlines <7074> : streams <1820832> : uri <2841555> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236228 Archived-At: > I just don't see how we can say it's almost always much better to use > `insert', and then use `insert-before-markers' by default. Very easy: historical accident (and the lack of window-point-insertion-type before Emacs-23). > "Do as we say, not as we do". More like: "don't do the same mistake we did". Stefan