From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ligatures Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 10:15:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200517165953.000044d2@web.de> <83blmi7hys.fsf@gnu.org> <837dx55qff.fsf@gnu.org> <834ks95cmz.fsf@gnu.org> <4faa291f-f2df-36d1-73d5-332b93a9b6d8@gmail.com> <83wo544hx5.fsf@gnu.org> <831rnc43ih.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftbs2jr5.fsf@gnu.org> <83lflj16jn.fsf@gnu.org> <83eerb145r.fsf@gnu.org> <831rnb0zld.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="31850"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, cpitclaudel@gmail.com, Pip Cet , alan@idiocy.org To: =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 16:16:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jcUwk-0008Bk-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:16:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcUwj-0007Ic-Kb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcUwF-0006rH-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:45664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcUwD-0006Fz-PT; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:15:46 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4C2D44407E3; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:15:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C81B64407E1; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:15:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1590243343; bh=fAO2IkSzjcB/DphkARzdIqZBs6GjNZd3Ot+zQs6mlgk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LpkmnTmz/PJ+VLukxnt/oxYsNlP5NhFTeaZg+UhMjbJ6FmCMZ97gdjSimrQMkv99j hMNyvkdFvLib5uh6zw6j0dwXBM1c3npu8TXvRny3HaokCxcynNhlk50ooKek0IYVd7 sw7SBMOo6aYiBHMCOYLMw+XAZzJa+wZsJ5GN4BnWZnfQderNAub6yTNmjS66Om59jJ P3/RGrlUOEbZGtLyyOIj2ogdcybsp0IHppaU0ktop0xyG8uydXqJwoBNCIEhcf45FQ 9SkSHeAilbOtxVNuV7QtFCchOMh56uamBF8n5rfuAP4UkaA+TEExaq6/85ooH1jHx7 ULFM+44mP2JOw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.27.250]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 786FE120611; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:15:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IuyhsOyEseu5iCIncw==?= message of "Sat, 23 May 2020 22:36:21 +0900") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/23 08:47:59 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251276 Archived-At: > According to the article I mentioned, it=E2=80=99s just passing the total= text > repeatedly until it runs out of space. But wouldn't that inherently imply an O(N=C2=B2) complexity? Stefan