From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elisp LSP Server Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <16338bdc2497fc51c6fb6d54ab370bfb@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <87ee99dv34.fsf@gmail.com> <07cf50ddddb5a9556aa94201a7ac88c9@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <87fstf3god.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87ily2947q.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fst5ae2t.fsf@gmail.com> <87v920j0jx.fsf@fastmail.fm> <839638db-98e1-4669-1b7e-82c8e26ec4aa@yandex.ru> <83ee8jf4vn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rms@gnu.org, joostkremers@fastmail.fm, theophilusx@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 18 14:51:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mcS6f-0001SA-RA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:51:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43508 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcS6e-0000Jf-9O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcRzO-00082p-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcRzK-0001NW-Vh; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2423E80699; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DCD138040B; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1634561011; bh=pA42nBHn0xLA/iTpn0qbyjaNlOdzlfn2ylnFDh7U9ps=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SM6TolicQcIDc6/JRNvrsV0pV3GiHmBic/FbfPiQLJLg8uxAeM/25pgh0ZrMvLarJ nCIyZno4b6NcKmkCrLBdLwX0d9RpSciv15rr1LnlCT+jCMWtAifvIOKbSEJEjrvVg/ dpBjl8MChCza2zi839o5ipZPYt7nB+6l55/y+On5Hl8BsHWSdvkkNirA4+oJiy13RJ FLcR4oeaU3U8hU005AQiSTbQOulkTTUXH52Mt1V7EXaxdQaIBPahfwJ87zqj0/60gH uJ+CeKtaWksFrImFEKwasXnTOvk0WqLotlynOC7h35uK/nprqqhtF4SDwCOX9NzrZq wefJAsL/On/KQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.241.23]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92B41120262; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83ee8jf4vn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:23:08 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277277 Archived-At: >> Indeed, it does mean that. An Emacs Lisp LSP server won't help us >> give Emacs whatever editing features for Emacs Lisp we want. All it >> would help is adding those features to VScode. > > I don't share that conclusion. +1 In any case, there is no such LSP server and I don't know of anyone who has even real plans to start working on it any time soon, so this is all very hypothetical. But I really see no reason to try and discourage anyone to start working on it. Stefan