From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58950: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (buffer-match-p): Optimise performance Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:24:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <875yfyebi0.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6331xts.fsf@posteo.net> <1119f0ff-aacf-b41e-e7f7-b0a00132b35f@yandex.ru> <255D9E93-422C-4A43-9876-751FDB8E61DB@acm.org> <73923B98-E4B8-44F8-9445-2FD05564ADA0@acm.org> <34AFCB0F-5F53-4033-BCDF-1B3001285169@acm.org> <268ed8c9-f56e-dc79-8e57-eeaaab98adc1@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17002"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , Philip Kaludercic , 58950@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 07:25:29 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pElb6-0004E9-LA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:25:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pElaq-0005Zh-8F; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pElan-0005Z2-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pElag-0005Md-DL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pElag-00021X-8i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58950 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 58950-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58950.16732454607724 (code B ref 58950); Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58950) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2023 06:24:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pEla0-00020W-1X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:24:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:53412) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pElZy-00020I-GY for 58950@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 01:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 32F0A4404AD; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 01:24:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7B5B6440375; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 01:24:07 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1673245447; bh=qmJG5orESEWXsLJ1Kkp9NWPXC2bhPd2zJHO4TyfMpb0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=lzjV1qvxUtZovoErLkK7/pY0ZQp4zsI7/ErJ0/jx4RDhZbrN69QWznrehwgwEmM95 IN18xYsvOb7gfuUNLmRQ85DT9jvnHRJnQFc30gTkefkberVVJ2PWyPRsxCHpHuhWyF hmE4zuywRCeimWmnO5BHgpGhNC3J0SsYPtRLWuN99sFxEl27g+S2Bhqk5EzvlCbdPL I+lchEOa8ccPWIEstSPup+4+GxQEZi+OMQmwyPwx1oCXXeP63rcOVVSnZpuKRHVMfU uPMuDVl9sa5lGeBuJ3bqYReAyAOkc9qA3EgF/f3TZS+hKo7GyArKdhbeuaAnNQUlwl eGoX14B+5+rYA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.200.228]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3257A120828; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 01:24:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <268ed8c9-f56e-dc79-8e57-eeaaab98adc1@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:48:23 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:252989 Archived-At: BTW, while this is an interesting discussion, I'm not sure it matters very much. The core question is still the same: does this performance issue matter? For `display-buffer`, AFAICT we only consider a single buffer, so I can't imagine `buffer-match-p` being an important factor to the overall performance. Stefan