From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-o Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 21:49:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <14611EDD-48F7-4BEB-AACD-EDD8CB815C3A@dancol.org> <87plrvcujl.fsf@dancol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24562"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , drew.adams@oracle.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, luangruo@yahoo.com, acm@muc.de, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 03 03:49:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sOp7x-0006DP-FQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 03:49:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOp7a-0004Hp-Ua; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 21:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOp7a-0004He-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 21:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOp7U-00028X-WB; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 21:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 704E6100042; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:49:12 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1719971351; bh=8KDHfEj3ATRFraFeSCXLaD8Tko3ckLxfLe+I2EY8B64=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=nKg7eZTeS2YTmIyY6Xha/2o+f+TN4KGgVfO5HXC1SVjC9w6A6oaBeG+BUQiSUYaaL p8KD1CQqvXqeGVxsrMfgDF+rusE4w1aqthZiJ8UHstWIzRhlDH2HlQrm7NS2WeBJXn qvh7gbhsLKQ++tzqJLbl2OTOqAWJe/4GvO+8wSdS76zDUrwRK35Xss/MGyBCZT05p+ Bgtstho1c0To1FWkWAnHbCH+PWIDSPQRwjhNchpEzt4+M0KLC2TJ0y0zEy4n1vE+LL XUFAEdeMGlD5eJskdKa95vSW86nSWKZ7fK9oiB8CWZsrNDnho3XylCTR4s124FsZis RF3sGeYU9oPmA== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 394FC10017F; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:49:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.245.253]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E13791208F7; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:49:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87plrvcujl.fsf@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:12:46 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321220 Archived-At: > Same here. It might also be useful to think about whether open-line can > be made more useful or DWIM-y in a way that doesn't break compatibility. Many people mentioned the use of `C-o` specifically because it's not as DWIMish as RET, so it sounds like it's probably better to leave it alone. Stefan