From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make standard If-Modified-Since headers Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86pruy3q6p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <873arfl1ui.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <867igqtp1g.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ejayjuf8.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204143995 4157 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2008 20:26:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 21:27:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUSra-0004FO-LN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:26:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUSr4-0007Lq-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUSqz-0007Kb-Gq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUSqw-0007KI-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUSqv-0007KF-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:10 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUSqv-0006XQ-RO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:09 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAPBVxUdMCpz5Wmdsb2JhbACQXwEgnTSBAg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,415,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="15306338" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2008 15:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.156.249]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id HWB62108; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3E39E7F25; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ejayjuf8.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:22:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90649 Archived-At: > to ask for opinions to make sure existing code (especially > parsers that might depend on the old format) doesn't break. > If there's a newer RFC, code relying on the old RFC will break > when trying to interoperate elsewhere (outside Emacs), unless > their maintainers can be alerted sooner by Emacs moving to the > newer RFC. If it MUST be broken sooner or later, better sooner. Yes, we should use the newer RFC format. Stefan