From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintenance suggestion on an emacs mode Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:57:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7dbe73ed0803301450i4ffe064dx91705d331234dca1@mail.gmail.com> <7dbe73ed0803301524i5bf9de08s68a3438f3517cb9e@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206928668 31791 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2008 01:57:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Mathias Dahl To: "paul r" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 31 03:58:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jg9Hs-00075k-9s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:58:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg9HG-0004W8-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg9HC-0004Vt-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg9H8-0004Vd-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jg9H8-0004Va-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:57:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 206-248-178-205.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.178.205] helo=ceviche.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jg9H4-0001mU-G8; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 338B7B40F9; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:57:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (paul r.'s message of "Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:41:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94000 Archived-At: >> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. What part of what I write >> above have I misunderstood? > Although my voice should not count too much because I'm not a sgml > user, I think the problem is not whether or not it is activated by > default. It is more that a mode should be fully usable, *including > optional keybindings it may provide*, without using the C-c[a-z], > which is in any case reserved to the user. In other words, one can > safely activate anything a mode provide without fearing its personnal > bindings will be overriden. Exactly, Stefan