From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug threading Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:24:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <3k6375fb19.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263483701 23401 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 15:41:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 16:41:33 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVRp2-0003mB-NC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:41:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41633 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRp3-00086X-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:41:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRZI-0002eA-Hr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:25:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRZE-0002av-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:25:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38917 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRZE-0002ad-JA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:25:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:20943 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVRZC-0006ou-8v; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:24:58 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq8EAK7FTktFxLLV/2dsb2JhbACBRdc7hDAEijY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,275,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="53740399" Original-Received: from 69-196-178-213.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.178.213]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2010 10:24:57 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7B61C70033; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:24:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:54:27 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119998 Archived-At: > I changed it so that messages without in-reply-to or references > headers get such headers pointing to the original bug report. I hope > this is an improvement. For technical reasons, it's easier to do this > than to point to the most recent message for any given bug number. In > the absence of a real in-reply-to, there's no way to tell which is > more likely to be correct anyway. You rock! Stefan