From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there something like `on-display-functions'? Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:37:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20100127135716.GA3432@muc.de> <20100127153733.GD3432@muc.de> <83k4v34f49.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx5r48gd.fsf@gnu.org> <20100128103856.GC2285@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264707757 20038 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2010 19:42:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 28 20:42:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaaFx-0001JW-1z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:42:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaaFw-00050L-5b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:42:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaaBo-0000bt-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:38:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaaBj-0000VH-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51433 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaaBi-0000V0-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:37:58 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:55178) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NaaBf-0003GI-Cx; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:37:55 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o0SJbqHp003816; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:37:53 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A7B1D3A7A3; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:37:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20100128103856.GC2285@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:38:56 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3458=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120607 Archived-At: > As a zero order approximation, something like > `before-display-functions', where an element would look like this: > (defun foo-before-display (buffer beg end) .....) > , BEG and END defining the piece of BUFFER about to be displayed. The > hook would be called before fontification. (Is it possible in general > to determine BEG and END before fontification?). That's exactly what jit-lock-register offers. Stefan