From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:34:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <874ob7tzlr.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <834ob78ixa.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290609266 3469 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2010 14:34:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org, Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 24 15:34:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLGQN-0000XA-PI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:34:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49238 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLGQN-0000L6-At for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:34:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55675 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLGQI-0000KF-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLGQH-0001QD-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:46293 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLGQF-0001Pp-Qi; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:34:11 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkoJAJ+x7ExFxKB0/2dsb2JhbACheH9yvlSFRwSEW41s X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,248,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="83437339" Original-Received: from 69-196-160-116.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.160.116]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 Nov 2010 09:34:10 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3FE6B660DC; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:34:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <834ob78ixa.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:06:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133115 Archived-At: > You never made clear that you are talking about separate downloads, > until now. > Having separate downloads is fine, assuming that Sean (or whoever > prepares the zip archives) can handle the extra workload. Actually, this discussion made me realize that we want the release package to be distributed without debug info: if we need debug info we might as well ask the user to install the snapshot version. Stefan