From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6077: 23.1.96; start-process error Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:28:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299296244 19189 80.91.229.12 (5 Mar 2011 03:37:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 03:37:24 +0000 (UTC) To: 6077@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 05 04:37:18 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PviIt-0006i5-Fq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:37:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47866 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PviIt-0005pE-2d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38570 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PviIc-0005jp-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PviIX-0000Ha-43 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PviIW-0000HW-QZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:36:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PviAw-0006cp-3w; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6077 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6077-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6077.129929572025440 (code B ref 6077); Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2011 03:28:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PviAa-0006cH-HB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:28:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PviAY-0006c5-Is for 6077@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:28:39 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlgHAFI8cU3O+LeP/2dsb2JhbACYaY17db4chWEEhRyPcA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,268,1297054800"; d="scan'208";a="94476385" Original-Received: from 206-248-183-143.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.183.143]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 04 Mar 2011 22:28:32 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AA158660D6; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:28:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:22:04 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:29:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44639 Archived-At: > This crops up in a few places. I have a vague memory that there is some > problem with/opposition to a general fix. Installed a fix for > browse-url. There is opposition to fixing it in start/call-process since it does the wrong thing if the command uses to relative filenames. There is no opposition to "a general fix" at all, although such a general fix would look like a macro that can easily be added where useful/needed, or maybe some additional arg, or clever reuse of existing arg. Stefan