From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New function: vc-ediff Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:15:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D785193.3030201@gmail.com> <4D79A736.6080707@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299882224 675 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2011 22:23:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 23:23:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PyAkF-0004VT-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:23:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49034 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PyAkE-00015f-Bc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:23:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42929 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PyAjI-0000ec-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PyAjH-0007FG-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:22:39 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:49868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PyAjG-0007F7-Tb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:22:39 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p2BMMbv3001193; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:22:37 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1DADE66135; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:15:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D79A736.6080707@gmail.com> (Christoph Scholtes's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:38:14 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3793=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3793> : streams <607307> : uri <824194> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137127 Archived-At: >> I think vc-ediff should not require any changes to ediff. >> You can check pcvs.el for an example of code that provides similar >> functionality without any ediff changes. > I saw that, but I honestly didn't like this implementation. I felt using > ediff-buffers' I would need to duplicate code that had already been written, > namely in `ediff-revision'. I guess it's OK if Michael likes it. I happen to think that vc-ediff should *replace* ediff-revision ;-) Stefan