From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: completion-all-completions not backward compatible? Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:50:49 -0300 Message-ID: References: <19954.16384.717779.359889@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307742684 20610 80.91.229.12 (10 Jun 2011 21:51:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 10 23:51:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QV9bn-0006pF-5O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:51:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43699 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV9bm-0007zR-Ab for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:51:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV9bS-0007z2-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:50:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV9bQ-0000nO-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV9bQ-0000nJ-LP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [190.177.196.60] (port=15264 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV9bQ-0007JI-8L; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 34C21667EF; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:50:49 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <19954.16384.717779.359889@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (T. V. Raman's message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:02:08 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140357 Archived-At: > Would it be possible to make the metadata argument to > completion-all-completions optional --- at present, it's breaking > code that calls that function with 4 rather than 5 arguments. Could you add to bug#8795 the info about your use of it (it's not indispensable, but since I didn't expect those functions to be used from outside packages, I'm interested to know how/where they're used)? Stefan