From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10946: 24.0.94; eval-after-load incompatible change Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:28:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331152281 19700 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2012 20:31:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10946@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 07 21:31:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NW1-0003fT-Dg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:31:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47332 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NW0-0003FU-QM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:31:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NVc-0003F9-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NVH-0000ei-Np for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:30:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NVH-0000eK-Jw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NVl-0002Fe-Rl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10946 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10946-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10946.13311522118595 (code B ref 10946); Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2012 20:30:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NUx-0002DL-1t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:3277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NUl-0002Cs-DT for 10946@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:30:00 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9FxJvl/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSGUJRJhAs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="166540677" Original-Received: from 69-196-155-229.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.196.155.229]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2012 15:28:58 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A185C6002; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:28:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:06:13 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57556 Archived-At: >>> I don't understand why it should have such a consequence. >> Because now you have to worry about load-file-name, which means >> (eval-after-load 'feature ... ) does nothing unless the file provided >> that feature is loaded. i.e. it is almost the same as (eval-after-load >> "file" ...). > I didn't mean to say that provide should run the after-load thingies ^^^ not > when load-file-name is nil. Sorry about this typo. But note that after thinking some more about it, I noticed that it's called "eval-after-LOAD", so it makes sense that it should only work when LOADing a file. Stefan