From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CL package suggestion Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:24:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <27y5qciwgd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <9lty10iwdr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333988711 1847 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2012 16:25:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ilya Shlyakhter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 09 18:25:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHOw-0006cD-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:25:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHOv-0000bw-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHOs-0000YL-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHOq-0001DY-JA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:60070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHHOq-0001Ch-EI; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:25:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYIACxOgk/O+KRD/2dsb2JhbABDDrgVA4EMgQiCCQEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgcBbYyi2GEeQSkRYFdgjBT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="172889527" Original-Received: from 206-248-164-67.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([206.248.164.67]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Apr 2012 12:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 51C83AE213; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:25:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ilya Shlyakhter's message of "Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:38:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.143.162 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149515 Archived-At: > Maybe cl-runtime, or cl-rt? I'd rather not insist on the "runtime" side. It will just be the new canonical name of "cl". We can't use "cl" because too many package presume an implementation of "cl" which is not namespace clean, whereas the new "cl" will be namespace-clean. Maybe 'cl-clean' ? Stefan > We need a (require 'cl-) which brings up CL but only within >> the "cl-" namespace. I don't have a good idea for naming. `cl-defs' >> might be OK, but I'm open to other suggestions. Maybe `cl-layer', or >> `cl-emu', or `cl-compat'? >> `cl-funs' is another option, indeed. >>