From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A patch for enforcing double-width CJK character display
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:33 -0400
Message-ID: <jwvwr5j4vbr.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
References: <4F85A138.6090900@i-soft.com.cn> <87vcl646c7.fsf@isil.kanru.info>
	<4F85AE69.9050002@i-soft.com.cn> <4F8698B0.2030703@i-soft.com.cn>
	<83hawp46p7.fsf@gnu.org> <4F86BA0F.4080301@i-soft.com.cn>
	<83ehrt3u0p.fsf@gnu.org> <4F87173F.3070801@i-soft.com.cn>
	<jwvehrspu5f.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<4F8782C8.2030005@i-soft.com.cn>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334327521 25799 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2012 14:32:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:32:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, kanru@kanru.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?B?6buE5bu65b+g?= <jianzhong.huang@i-soft.com.cn>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 16:31:59 2012
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1SIhXa-0007rd-S8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:31:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35686 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1SIhXa-00084F-5Y
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:31:58 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44126)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SIgXP-000109-E0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:50 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SIgXK-0005HU-PS
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:42 -0400
Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:18039)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>)
	id 1SIgXI-0005H2-8o; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:36 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYIACxOgk9sr+di/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFtjKLYYR5BKRFgV2DAw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="174057446"
Original-Received: from 108-175-231-98.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home)
	([108.175.231.98])
	by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA;
	13 Apr 2012 09:27:33 -0400
Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848)
	id 50FF25809E; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F8782C8.2030005@i-soft.com.cn> (=?utf-8?B?Ium7hOW7uuW/oCIn?=
	=?utf-8?B?cw==?= message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:35:04 +0800")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
X-Received-From: 206.248.143.162
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149635
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/149635>

> Here is a problem the patch fixed, generally The pixel width of
> auto-matched CJK font is not exactly equals to double monospace font
> width. mostly, For same font size, the pixel width of CJK font is
> smaller than double pixel width of monospace font.

Ah, I see, thanks.  I probably won't benefit much from it, but it seems
like a good feature to have.


        Stefan