From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A patch for enforcing double-width CJK character display Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:33 -0400 Message-ID: <jwvwr5j4vbr.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <4F85A138.6090900@i-soft.com.cn> <87vcl646c7.fsf@isil.kanru.info> <4F85AE69.9050002@i-soft.com.cn> <4F8698B0.2030703@i-soft.com.cn> <83hawp46p7.fsf@gnu.org> <4F86BA0F.4080301@i-soft.com.cn> <83ehrt3u0p.fsf@gnu.org> <4F87173F.3070801@i-soft.com.cn> <jwvehrspu5f.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <4F8782C8.2030005@i-soft.com.cn> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334327521 25799 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2012 14:32:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, kanru@kanru.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?6buE5bu65b+g?= <jianzhong.huang@i-soft.com.cn> Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 16:31:59 2012 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1SIhXa-0007rd-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:31:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35686 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1SIhXa-00084F-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SIgXP-000109-E0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SIgXK-0005HU-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:18039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SIgXI-0005H2-8o; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:36 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYIACxOgk9sr+di/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFtjKLYYR5BKRFgV2DAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="174057446" Original-Received: from 108-175-231-98.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.175.231.98]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 13 Apr 2012 09:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 50FF25809E; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4F8782C8.2030005@i-soft.com.cn> (=?utf-8?B?Ium7hOW7uuW/oCIn?= =?utf-8?B?cw==?= message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:35:04 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.143.162 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149635 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/149635> > Here is a problem the patch fixed, generally The pixel width of > auto-matched CJK font is not exactly equals to double monospace font > width. mostly, For same font size, the pixel width of CJK font is > smaller than double pixel width of monospace font. Ah, I see, thanks. I probably won't benefit much from it, but it seems like a good feature to have. Stefan