From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12311: 24.1.50; z in special-mode-map Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:54:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346342097 30430 80.91.229.3 (30 Aug 2012 15:54:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12311@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 30 17:54:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T7758-0000IG-78 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:54:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45387 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7756-0002bG-0K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:54:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7753-0002b4-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7752-0004yv-PK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7752-0004yr-MB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T776A-0001ZP-DW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12311 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12311-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12311.13463421195980 (code B ref 12311); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12311) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2012 15:55:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T775S-0001YP-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:55:19 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:52321) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T775Q-0001YG-Tn for 12311@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:55:17 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG6Zu09FxKEe/2dsb2JhbABEsEiDSYEIghUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDYhABboJjSaDHgOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="197088500" Original-Received: from 69-196-161-30.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.161.30]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Aug 2012 11:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A791059407; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:54:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:41:22 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63613 Archived-At: > I just got rid of that binding in my .emacs, but I think that binding > is a bad idea. Not all the buffers in special modes are things people > don't mind deleting, and this key can cause annoyance if typed by > accident. Feel free to remove it in the trunk, yes. Stefan