Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?

[Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>]

>     As mentioned in my reply there, the two aren't quite compatible (because
>     (lexical-let ((tab-width 4)) foo) will be a lexical binding, whereas
>     (let ((tab-width 4)) foo) will be a dynamic binding)
> Is it really a sensible thing to make a lexical binding for a variable
> that is normally dynamic?

We don't need to answer this question, because the difference between
`let' and `lexical-let' in this respect is more likely to be accidental.

This said, there can be good reasons to force a lexical binding, when
you fear that the code might be run in a context where the variable
might happen to be defvar'd.


        Stefan