From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12760: letf doc is not very helpful Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:52:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351518825 8600 80.91.229.3 (29 Oct 2012 13:53:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12760@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 29 14:53:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpmp-0001FX-Qt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:53:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpmh-0003pq-PG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpmf-0003pk-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:53:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpma-0001e0-NP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpma-0001dv-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:53:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpow-0003O7-3t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12760 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12760-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12760.135151892212556 (code B ref 12760); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12760) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2012 13:55:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpoH-0003GP-Mr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:51069) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSpoF-0003GD-0M for 12760@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:55:19 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu0/O+LET/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIWAQUnLyMQCw4mEhQYDSSIIboJkEQDozOBWIMF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="203064135" Original-Received: from 206-248-177-19.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.177.19]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 29 Oct 2012 09:52:52 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1FE20661F0; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:52:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:52:50 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66192 Archived-At: > -> Like `cl-letf', but with some extra backward compatibility. > This is so vague as to not be useful. The only difference (handling of funbound symbols for symbol-function) is one I'd rather not document because it's deprecated. Stefan