From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: icomplete-mode vs. iswitchb Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 20:43:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386639809 14259 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2013 01:43:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alex Schroeder , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Mathias Dahl Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 10 02:43:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VqCMH-0004nr-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:43:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46786 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqCMH-0007Ey-0t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 20:43:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqCM6-0007D3-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 20:43:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqCLz-0005TI-7N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 20:43:22 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:53698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqCLz-0005TD-2A; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 20:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBA1h9DL014227; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B4BA7AE2E5; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:43:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Mathias Dahl's message of "Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:44:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4787=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4787> : inlines <294> : streams <1088190> : uri <1619406> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166237 Archived-At: > But the completion hint is totally weird. If I type just one "o" > above, it works as it should. I don't see much difference between the "oo" case you've shown and the "o" case, so I don't see why one "works as it should" while the other "is totally weird". Can you explain a bit more? Stefan