From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The fixes-bug field Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:32:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20140116141315.CA3BE380835@snark.thyrsus.com> <20140116163011.GC17303@thyrsus.com> <83d2jr3ly9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389900792 3109 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2014 19:33:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Darren Hoo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 16 20:33:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3sgn-0000vM-2s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:33:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34672 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3sgm-0000nD-Kk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:33:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3sgY-0000Y1-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:33:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3sgQ-0003V8-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:36763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3sgQ-0003V4-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:32:54 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAKABK/CFFMCoyj/2dsb2JhbABEvgwEA3sXc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: AhAKABK/CFFMCoyj/2dsb2JhbABEvgwEA3sXc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="45130697" Original-Received: from 76-10-140-163.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.140.163]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Jan 2014 14:32:53 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A35AB600B8; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:32:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Darren Hoo's message of "Fri, 17 Jan 2014 02:38:48 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168568 Archived-At: > What benefit do we get by using bzr fixes bug over mentioning it in the > commit log like (Bug#16462)? I can see some of them in the ChangeLogs. I agree that bug#NNN is the better format. Bzr preferred a URL, so we obliged, but since Git doesn't care about it, I'd rather use this format. Stefan