From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest -- electric-pair-mode change Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:24:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87d2h0ujls.fsf_-_@kitaj.lan> <8761mqfw38.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396538723 16309 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2014 15:25:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: joaotavora@gmail.com (=?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?=) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 03 17:25:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WVjVy-0005Tr-If for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:25:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVjVx-0003Ud-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVjVo-0003Dx-33 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVjVg-0003G5-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:38164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVjVg-0003G0-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s33FOqbF021137; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:24:52 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C83E4603AE; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:24:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1v?= =?windows-1252?Q?ora=22's?= message of "Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:43:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4901=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4901> : inlines <688> : streams <1151235> : uri <1719202> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171275 Archived-At: > Anyway, a few weeks using it, I realized that this behaviour is > annoying, is practically never what I want, and is hard to predict. Agreed. For emacs-24 we should either change it to improve the check whether the string is balanced (e.g. what we have on trunk), or not check at all. Stefan