From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: compiler warnings for "unused" method specializers Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:07:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8737jz251z.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87vawvxxc9.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476452180 17218 195.159.176.226 (14 Oct 2016 13:36:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:36:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 14 15:36:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bv2eV-00024q-BT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:35:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47370 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv2eT-0003Qj-Rf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv2Fj-00078F-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv2Fe-0007S2-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34230 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv2Fe-0007R1-H7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:10:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bv2FS-0005Jy-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:10:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:QSCWwhFXnWBtVshKE4Rod/UntoU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208243 Archived-At: >> So maybe it's not worth adding extra compiler code to handle method >> specializers, but it would be worth allowing multiple _s? I do like the >> use of _ to say "this variable intentionally and permanently ignored". > How about supporting CL-style ignore declarations? > (defun foo (x) (declare (ignore x)) 1) You can already do (defun foo (x) (ignore x) 1) -- Stefan