From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding the dump Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:09:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ef8z4g1m.fsf@igel.home> <838sz75u7p.fsf@gnu.org> <877eer4e4x.fsf@igel.home> <835zub5p3i.fsf@gnu.org> <8736pf408v.fsf@igel.home> <83womq3z5c.fsf@gnu.org> <871s4yxfvb.fsf@igel.home> <83o9823xcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87womqvyy4.fsf@igel.home> <4f30b2b598e71d2c6ad766a3da8e4a33.squirrel@dancol.org> <87o982vszn.fsf@igel.home> <87k1ipx3jq.fsf@igel.home> <87bm41wzmv.fsf@igel.home> <608533e75f41da3e36e191f8a670af05.squirrel@dancol.org> <725a9f97-8bb5-4592-2512-dbd422023f51@cs.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="132929"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 29 00:10:51 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1goG3G-000YRS-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:10:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40179 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goG3E-0002QF-Uj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:10:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goG38-0002Pr-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:10:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goG37-0005K0-ML for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:10:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51008 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goG37-0004mf-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:10:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1goG2W-000XXc-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:10:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:xkmnj8ACaoq33wr8XcZyyqm68Sk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232784 Archived-At: > a directory part (i.e., does not have a '/' in POSIX). In this case in the > past it has been reasonably common for argv[0] to not identify the > executable that would be found by searching PATH for a file with that name, In my experience it is much more in the "corner case" camp than "reasonably common". I understand your mileage will vary, but I think the above wording makes it sound like it's much more frequent than I believe it is. Stefan