From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New multi-command facility displays in the wrong echo area. Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:51:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20201009163445.GB4027@ACM> <20201009203810.GC4027@ACM> <83imbi609a.fsf@gnu.org> <20201010103233.GB5662@ACM> <834kn25o6b.fsf@gnu.org> <20201010124446.GC5662@ACM> <831ri65jpc.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh4u44mx.fsf@gnu.org> <83imbg4yl3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3332"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 15 00:51:56 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSpch-0000j1-Th for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:51:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37626 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSpcg-00011T-Vq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:51:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSpc7-0000ZK-Qw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSpc2-0003ly-5y; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F2A1710034E; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:51:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 82C9510022A; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:51:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1602715870; bh=18+XeuKQiresIyYHsXkLAuNIqD2vy4XdVS6PvgYqdNE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=J2bUfN/uHeTOApZ6O9O7GATFiFez/rCSFsx8MCqBhjYf14jaAKRu68HPHzpclFAZS k2iRHDtJuRT83CAaBAAoYPVWq8PgDwwDpQKoYbJABgXkFIN7+RTULzymQrafnVlQ6f AeFCf/QO+ucPg0LgXrQlmD75mNKCK8pHvMEA0Wein+AdQZyFAXX/XPAoJLUE3oPRbg icdPdRdnpOGl0N4ODhKjwIRwKV6da7AEobeX1SPcRwhzedRYc+k4t/VG/yL9ZK7VZl PBTuUwMTRGKBdwGmF7yRT1pKahfkrtS887Z1I9tMQEku/xQcbyv1m2eGxc9zDKi7Mv 3VQxfWM+eXMeQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D31F120230; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:51:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:44:15 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/14 18:51:12 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257690 Archived-At: > (or (eq (window-frame) (window-frame (active-minibuffer-window))) > (eq (frame-parameter (window-frame (active-minibuffer-window)) 'minibuffer) 'only))) I think it would be cleaner (i.e. better express the intent) if it was written something like (eq (mini-window-of (selected-frame)) (active-minibuffer-window)) which may require writing `mini-window-of` first (and choosing a better name for it along the way). Stefan