From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NonGNU ELPA Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:11:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87mtzt6qhf.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9eg4gm5.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8k7yt7n.fsf@gnu.org> <87ima56h1a.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25142"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Amin Bandali , Richard Stallman , emacs-devel To: Daniel =?windows-1252?Q?Mart=EDn?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 22:12:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kleqz-0006RS-B8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 22:12:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45182 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kleqy-0002Cz-9A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:12:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kleq4-0001mx-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:11:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:22923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kleq1-0007D0-Tw; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:11:31 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3D23180438; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:11:27 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BF57380922; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:11:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1607202685; bh=uRF0FRhZY9HfkJ/Q76oBYTYCf9u06hn3pBe42KQ7Q2s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mIzuV9H98P/Hdk4o4GJ9eHZMMXiXuFFlMZ3qvy2CfOTAMqP7Qh3P6tn08/lmRbqub MIBvIHYz9AQFLnq0j4euR1c0Y6YZvDbqjxlxjmYKNg6gNkFRhvP8G9X7B/6qUv6jpe tZCuu5oYxx14A9FwrJXkrVlmsjxdbYMXfUJOCr+5bQE0CtwZ5Z5wgy9+Ywmy7a2cKh EPHyvpXYEuuyLu6BbNCPa/6VILQNP4n/UMuGIXORCJYeyTeFbH7QEnRIWJQ3P9KZa9 ij/yE/JNWTDHqizR6XPkr/TuTIbpKmjOMXCj/DYeUCB9KVD08Hc8qaWf9sKGDYdjbk ZjU09QeRwvowQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-165-136-52.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.136.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E7871201A6; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:11:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: ("Daniel =?windows-1252?Q?Mart=EDn?= =?windows-1252?Q?=22's?= message of "Sat, 05 Dec 2020 19:37:02 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260391 Archived-At: >> We already have that for those packages in GNU ELPA if you install the >> `gnu-elpa` package (which I still hope we'll be able to bundle within >> the tarball of Emacs-28). >> We could easily extend it to the NonGNU archive, indeed. > Ah, I didn't know about the gnu-elpa package. I haven't tested it yet, > but it looks like it already implements the feature I suggested. It's quite young and would benefit from feedback from users, BTW. > Good thing it is considered for inclusion with Emacs 28. Not sure it's considered yet, to be honest. I'd like it, but it's not my decision. Stefan