From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:05:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86eeifawx8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83a6t274ru.fsf@gnu.org> <86bldh9r4s.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83h7n95gx8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8874"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 22 15:11:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2x9i-000290-Qn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:11:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42876 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2x9h-0005Zm-7J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:11:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2x4f-00089V-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:57461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2x4Z-0003mb-N7; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:06:05 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5BD514404E6; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:05:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 384D6440430; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:05:57 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1611324357; bh=uw7BrQbJGWmvB6xv0nlA6NKlB1AWZFWoy44HdIJczWI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=UaGst4WnjcLVwZqH9A0HDCoeAjvpgPHssLcbaw4nv9ANYC6b2emWKMl9UL8xiDm/E La0ihk+zV3qy7rccT0XfVs3mljY9K78h+N+VHNprf0O6+b0S2yw7yMYPb/WSVLJsih KaAbe8CeKaDT3Pecu/oADKpmLMaEze3zx0lq+V6akUVfP+qXNMK8sOh7Yy4OehqXcr cbfe3C+GYsJQkt/tn1C6nvUwXrRPQ0NelVhxIdZ1twVbsYva0XaCpHe15mVnlaCQMq qol7LitlVabIz1/sf0BSb5NMkKH1tZ9qDblC9HNqaE1O73GRGPs4DJbPzyzCPDXmB2 Eyg9EpBPtVMbA== Original-Received: from alfajor (65-110-220-188.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.220.188]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3F18120548; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:05:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83h7n95gx8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:50:43 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263276 Archived-At: > It wasn't. But several people agreed and no one objected. So I think > we have a consensus there. FWIW that was my understanding as well ;-) Stefan