From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gnu.guix.devel,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Nicolas Graves] [PATCH v6 01/10] rde: emacs: Start emacs in --daemon mode, with shepherd and pid-file Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:52:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20240410234923.29319-2-ngraves@ngraves.fr> <875xwotg35.fsf@trop.in> <87zfu0m9ps.fsf@ngraves.fr> <87jzl22u5w.fsf@gnu.org> <87frvp4a4u.fsf@ngraves.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5156"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Nicolas Graves , Ludovic =?windows-1252?Q?Court?= =?windows-1252?Q?=E8s?= , "Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Andrew Tropin To: =?windows-1252?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Bidar Original-X-From: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 14 22:53:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rw6qT-000186-8e for gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 22:53:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw6pz-0004HU-Nn; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:52:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw6px-0004GZ-Fz; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:52:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw6pv-00041d-JI; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:52:29 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0CD9B441778; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:52:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1713127942; bh=voOS5XC+SD1XtFBsbCr0fDb6jykjzG4Ws7iTbYpkkPY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=cMmWNcYqtaBXVrZ4cSOgINJNrpSxBB+icyUHA9WhTW7ijlSmVHPkZClrsg0LCjbw9 n9VIQElctigVZWNqx7I+t4n+cSkmj85B90b2SAGhDYOFtryTU0zBX0z6/eoUVI6KlI mwTJqWWXORTa+IEd2h3+9xux2fgB2fsMXGXXmviJEgtwla/ON4Jjxg6mSBcQegMQ9l 1bz1B+M6ek5w3MFqE0k05GSWY3WxuCZB9LyEucnLKm8478NL48QCp87OXlkMnj1xqJ Ex/M0Hs0VnZATudbW6q+PbuP5mkxWfm/HL2z9yZMNngM8Xe8abdyq0k/nkk6I0hb+L lu5aEbqX5jMUw== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 70E5644176D; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.201.215]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 314491202FC; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:52:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87le5f2202.fsf@> (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Bj=F6rn?= Bidar"'s message of "Sun, 14 Apr 2024 22:11:25 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.gnu.guix.devel:69929 gmane.emacs.devel:317726 Archived-At: > Would that make sense on systems where systemd is used? If libsystem is > already installed it would be more convenient for the user to use the > already installed and very likely loaded libsystemd instead of > reimplementing the feature. You might be right, but it's hard to say without seeing the replacement code and the actual doc of the protocol. Stefan