From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line Date: 25 Mar 2004 16:54:29 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87oeqlj79q.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <200403251639.i2PGdXDF030749@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080251770 31746 80.91.224.253 (25 Mar 2004 21:56:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: offby1@blarg.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 25 22:56:02 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B6cpW-0000b7-00 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:56:02 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B6cpV-0005R1-00 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:56:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B6cp9-0002LG-3O for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:55:39 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B6cog-0002KP-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B6co9-0002DD-Bd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B6co9-0002D7-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E02C21175; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:54:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7EE998B4C3; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:54:29 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ams@kemisten.nu In-Reply-To: <200403251639.i2PGdXDF030749@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, requis 5, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:20934 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:20934 > But on another side, the idea by Kim Storm (I think) of adding a set > of bindings for recompile, compile, and next-error wasn't a bad one. > Those are things I always wondered why they aren't bound by default. For what it's worth I always thought C-c C-c was the natural binding for `compile' (or more generally for "here, I'm done editing, now process what I've edited"). Stefan