From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: set-face-attribute :height gacks on floating-point Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r6ekogs6.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <87d4q4o9it.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <87iqzw34yx.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <47D3A179.3060501@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205068256 14225 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2008 13:10:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eric Hanchrow , emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=1FFFFFFFrv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 09 14:11:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYLJA-0007pb-Ml for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:11:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYLIc-0004pc-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYLIX-0004oY-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYLIV-0004nk-VQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYLIV-0004nf-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYLIV-0005zU-PE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYLIV-0006i6-Bl for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYLIS-0005yK-85 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYLIR-0005xu-V5; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:36 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmgCANR+00fO+J2CdGdsb2JhbACQfgEwl3WBBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,469,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="15759403" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2008 09:10:35 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.157.130]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id PQT53835; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:10:35 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C5B7F7FD4; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:10:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <47D3A179.3060501@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=1FFFFFFFrv=22's?= message of "Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:36:09 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91872 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21466 Archived-At: Stefan> What version is that? >>> >>> That's the unicode-xft branch, gotten from >>> git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs.git with "git checkout unicode-xft" >> >> That branch is very out-of-date -- I used to merge to it, but I haven't >> in a long time (it wasn't clear that it had any future). >> > It should be removed, can anybody with CVS access do that? Do we have any > policy for removing branches? It's usually better to keep those things around. We could change it in the same way we changed the unicode branch, so people are aware they're using an obsolete branch. Stefan