From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scrollbar thumbs Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <16F8B7E14CB049B9A860B703B0776C3F@editkapc> <6FB20B525B45459297A5BB57A36F7A4E@editkapc> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257289245 652 80.91.229.12 (3 Nov 2009 23:00:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "grischka" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 04 00:00:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N5SMg-0000gu-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5SMf-0003w4-LS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5SMa-0003vv-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5SMV-0003v8-IR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37579 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5SMV-0003v5-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:36573) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5SMU-0001m4-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nA3N0N22024311; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:00:23 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A932A3A036; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:00:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (grischka's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:10:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3398=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116604 Archived-At: > It cannot be impossible to get standard behavior (no matter what it is) with > the standard API, because otherwise the behavior would hardly spread enough > to become standard :) I'll be waiting for your patch that proves it, Stefan