From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eshell compatibility Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:47:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87r5rpb66l.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258994970 23690 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2009 16:49:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:49:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCc6K-0004Lo-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:49:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59628 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCc6J-0006Mx-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:49:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCc4h-0005qd-L6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:47:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCc4d-0005qB-Hd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:47:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35562 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCc4d-0005q8-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:34505 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCc4c-0000rO-OC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:47:35 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqsEAI9LCkvO+IIa/2dsb2JhbACBTdVPhDwEigI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,273,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="49856549" Original-Received: from 206-248-130-26.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.130.26]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2009 11:47:32 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5EE4C80E5; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:47:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87r5rpb66l.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:40:34 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117596 Archived-At: > Eshell contains a lot of compatibility code. Does it mean, eshell is > still synchronized upstream, and I must add compatibility code as well? > Or could I trust, that the version in trunk is used in GNU Emacs 23, and > anybody moving it out must add compatibility code herself? I don't think there's any kind of "upstream" version of Eshell any more. In any case I wouldn't worry about it. Stefan