From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6774: Cut and paste with C-w/mouse-2 not working? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:09:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4C55EF50.3080100@alice.it> <4C572AE6.7070104@harpegolden.net> <87wrs8ohnp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4C573A2A.3030007@harpegolden.net> <8762zphkaw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4C5B4E28.4090808@harpegolden.net> <87fwyr3glm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4C5C7915.7080407@harpegolden.net> <87hbj6jj7o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4C5DE6C7.5080706@harpegolden.net> <87vd7kcx52.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4C6038B9.1090508@swipnet.se> <4C615BB9.8030905@swipnet.se> <4C61938B.5080302@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281631130 8386 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2010 16:38:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, 6774@debbugs.gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 12 18:38:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojann-00078N-6K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:38:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37931 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ojanm-0002Wq-HK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53869 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ojanc-0002VW-CD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:38:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojanb-0008Ak-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:38:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ojanb-0008Ae-6d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:38:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjaLy-0007Gb-Pz; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6774 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6774-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6774.128162935627917 (code B ref 6774); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6774) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2010 16:09:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjaLE-0007GE-1N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:09:16 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm2.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.2]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjaLB-0007G9-GC for 6774@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost2.adm.correo ([10.20.102.39]) by IMPaqm2.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id tTAn1e00F0r0BT63MU9VUt; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:09:29 +0200 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([88.12.128.176]) by IMPmailhost2.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id tU9U1e00F3oVAVk1iU9VPU; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:09:29 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="monnier$movistar.es" |auth_email="monnier@movistar.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6DF63660F0; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:09:28 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:14:43 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:10:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39450 Archived-At: >> Putting it in set_point_both would be much worse than on >> post-command-hook (set-point-both is a very low-level function, >> triggered in many more cases than just moving the cursor). > If a test to check if we have to newly own the PRIMARY > selection is trivial, there should be no problem. And what do we do with the result of the check? This function too low-level to be able to perform the "set PRIMARY" from there. > Another candidate for checking that is somewher near here in > command_loop_1 () (around line 1818). > finalize: > if (current_buffer == prev_buffer > && last_point_position != PT > && NILP (Vdisable_point_adjustment) > && NILP (Vglobal_disable_point_adjustment)) > { > This place is similar to post-command-hook, but we can avoid > unnecessary Lisp calls in many cases. Yes, that's like post-command-hook. I'm more worried about the semantics than about the performance impact. Doing the "set PRIMARY" from C-w and friends is much easier and robust. Doing it in S-right is OK as well. Doing it in forward-char is not and doing it for `right' (by rebinding it to a new command) doesn't sound too attractive. Stefan