From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr vs. git repository Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:28:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20110101.092838.211465745.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293902949 15854 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 17:29:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 17:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Werner LEMBERG Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 18:29:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ5GK-0005FR-MR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 18:29:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ5GK-0002Y4-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33047 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ5GF-0002Xp-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:29:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ5GE-0005GM-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:28:59 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:14763 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ5GE-0005GI-SF; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:28:58 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEACvzHk1Ld/TY/2dsb2JhbACkRHS8A4VKBIRljhs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,260,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="86874266" Original-Received: from 75-119-244-216.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.244.216]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Jan 2011 12:28:57 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 81F1D58D59; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 12:28:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20110101.092838.211465745.wl@gnu.org> (Werner LEMBERG's message of "Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:28:38 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134121 Archived-At: > As you can see, bzr still needs about three times more bandwidth in > both receiving and sending... I'm glad to see that Bzr is now within an acceptable factor of Git in this respect. Stefan