From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9653: 24.0.50; `ucs-names' - Why all of the ("" . XXX) entries? Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:39:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83sjn8r553.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317764381 22273 80.91.229.12 (4 Oct 2011 21:39:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9653@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 23:39:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCi8-00020A-3A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:39:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60535 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCi7-0005IX-KC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:39:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37903) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCi4-0005IE-0U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCi2-0006nj-Qw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:39:31 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCi2-0006nZ-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCjV-00057v-FI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:41:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9653 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9653-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9653.131776445519690 (code B ref 9653); Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9653) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2011 21:40:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCjO-00057X-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:40:55 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCjM-00057O-1O for 9653@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p94LdHg2031485; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:39:17 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D14B4B4346; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:39:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 4 Oct 2011 11:30:22 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.5 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered SUBJ_PORN_PHRASE133=0.5, RV4000=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <4000> : streams <688208> : uri <975786> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:41:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52185 Archived-At: > No one gave any indication that how this happens is a mystery. The question > posed by this bug thread is whether and why we want to have such unnamed > characters in `ucs-names'. That's all. How those names happen to be there has > never been in question. I'd have hoped my message #23 (http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9653#23) made it all clear already. We're just discussing how to fix the problem. Stefan