From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10946: 24.0.94; eval-after-load incompatible change Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:57:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331067527 15778 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2012 20:58:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10946@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 06 21:58:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S51T0-0001Sa-PS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:58:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39218 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S51T0-00022D-3W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:58:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S51Sy-00021s-3r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:58:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S51Sw-0007hs-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:58:39 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S51Sw-0007he-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:58:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S51TK-0001EJ-9Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10946 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10946-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10946.13310675294709 (code B ref 10946); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2012 20:58:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S51T6-0001Dj-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:58:49 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:54188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S51St-0001DM-IW for 10946@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:58:37 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9FxJvl/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSGUJRJhAs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="166403932" Original-Received: from 69-196-155-229.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.155.229]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Mar 2012 15:57:39 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 56BCB59414; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:57:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:29:40 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57544 Archived-At: >> Wouldn't a better fix be to make Pymacs set load-file-name, then? > Even if it worked, it'd be worse because it means getting rid of > (eval-after-load 'feature ...), I don't understand why it should have such a consequence. Stefan