From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reachable killed buffers Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:10:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <504848D0.4020908@yandex.ru> <5048D826.3040103@yandex.ru> <5049C400.8070400@gmx.at> <504DB6DD.9030002@yandex.ru> <504E042E.5040100@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347311446 3223 80.91.229.3 (10 Sep 2012 21:10:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 10 23:10:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBFo-0003CQ-87 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:10:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59890 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBFk-0006BU-MK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBFh-0006BG-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:10:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBFg-0006bO-DX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:10:41 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:49315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBFg-0006bJ-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q8ALAcxJ012780; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2E2ACB4085; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:10:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:15:11 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153226 Archived-At: > as well. But please add comments to those functions indicating the > constraints that they need to satisfy. BTW, the basic constraint goes as follows: Assignments need to either modify objects which we have no yet marked, or install a new value which we know is marked already (or which we're about to mark). Stefan