From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: icomplete-mode vs. iswitchb Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:04:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8761ra7uq3.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386734706 6790 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2013 04:05:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 04:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Eglen , emacs-devel To: Josh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 11 05:05:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqb2s-0000QU-TO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:05:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52620 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqb2s-0002I3-0m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqb2i-0002DZ-4M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:05:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqb2a-0000Lc-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:05:00 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:50612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqb2a-0000LR-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:04:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBB44ieJ025443; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:04:45 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CB145AE321; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:04:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (josh@foxtail.org's message of "Mon, 9 Dec 2013 21:15:20 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4788=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4788> : inlines <301> : streams <1088856> : uri <1620529> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166275 Archived-At: > favor is Stefan's presumption that the package preferred by the > majority of users could not be configured to behave like the package > preferred by a far smaller minority. WTF are you talking about? IDO is just as available as ever. Stefan