From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7822: 24.0.50; `fit-window-to-buffer': take display artefacts into account Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:31:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <541F129D.3000402@gmx.at> <541FE5A4.8030900@gmx.at> <867a1372-84f3-4c30-89df-49cc2cbd06dc@default> <54205FA1.7020106@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411414355 10470 80.91.229.3 (22 Sep 2014 19:32:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7822@debbugs.gnu.org, 7822-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 22 21:32:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9LV-0008Pr-Ku for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:32:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48752 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9LV-0002VN-9Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9LK-0002S6-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9LD-00018l-9e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9LD-00018L-5w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9L7-0001GK-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:32:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7822 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7822-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7822.14114142984817 (code B ref 7822); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7822) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2014 19:31:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9Kk-0001FY-0s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:31:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:51184) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XW9Kh-0001ET-P6; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:31:36 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArgGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA0AQiBFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIwULCy0HEhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegcKhC4EqRmBaoFxgVsh X-IPAS-Result: ArgGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA0AQiBFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIwULCy0HEhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegcKhC4EqRmBaoFxgVsh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="90579365" Original-Received: from 69-165-145-6.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.145.6]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Sep 2014 15:31:35 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 068D961782; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:31:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:24:43 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93646 Archived-At: > The ER is for that and more. It asks that a user be able to control > "how much" it "takes display artefacts into account". But just > being able to tell it not to take any into account would probably > be acceptable. Could we have at least some kind of motivating example for why one might want that kind of control? Stefan