From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The future of Follow Mode - a proposal. Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:57:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20160218195630.GA2697@acm.fritz.box> <837fi1u5qt.fsf@gnu.org> <20160219142522.GA3193@acm.fritz.box> <83povsr8cc.fsf@gnu.org> <20160219181834.GC3193@acm.fritz.box> <83io1kr12k.fsf@gnu.org> <20160220124415.GA1758@acm.fritz.box> <83wppzo7lf.fsf@gnu.org> <20160223231156.GA26899@acm.fritz.box> <83a8mqhvym.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456340271 31365 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 18:57:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 19:57:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYed3-0000IF-EV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:57:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37748 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYed3-0001y4-1K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:57:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYecz-0001xw-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYecw-0001IE-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:47462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYecv-0001I8-Tx; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.DIT.UMontreal.CA (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u1OIvjik020353; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:57:45 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 519AA6020E; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:57:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83a8mqhvym.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:14:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5591=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5591> : inlines <4381> : streams <1592868> : uri <2150523> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200634 Archived-At: >> As mentioned last time this follow-mode discussion came up, I think >> a better approach (maybe not easier, but more generally useful) would be >> to add an Elisp hook that can control the order in which >> windows are redisplayed. > But that's orthogonal to the issues described by Alan, right? Hmm... unless I misunderstood his suggestion, no. Because "my" Elisp hook would let you do what he wants directly in Elisp without any changes in C. Stefan