From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: why was iso-acc.el removed from master? Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:16:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fuvyuu4y.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <8760wto0fp.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457702196 28962 80.91.229.3 (11 Mar 2016 13:16:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:16:36 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 14:16:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aeMvZ-0008VB-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:16:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeMvY-0000Fm-Og for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:16:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeMvT-0000Fe-LL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:16:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeMvQ-0004or-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:16:19 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeMvP-0004oW-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:16:16 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aeMvM-0008NQ-57 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:16:12 +0100 Original-Received: from 206-248-186-70.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.186.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:16:12 +0100 Original-Received: from monnier by 206-248-186-70.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:16:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 206-248-186-70.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7ayoohCo9/MWQS3qoVTLoc9uk9A= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201464 Archived-At: > In case there are not and I would agree to be the maintainer, I then > have to sign FSF copyright? Could I do that by email (scanned signed > document)? > BTW since we are now in the 21 century, is there any change that one > could simply signed these papers by a pgp/smime key or are US courts not > that modern :'( The exact method required depends on details such as where you reside. AFAIK if you reside in the US, nowadays the process can be "fully electronic", tho IIUC this means "scanned signed documents". I don't know where we're at when it comes to other countries, tho. Stefan