From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is it ok to use (redisplay), or should this be left to the experts? Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:58:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871s5ktf9b.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87va1pgb3m.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="119049"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 12 04:59:37 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtPEO-000UqC-GR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:59:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60766 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtPEN-0004yw-E1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:59:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtPEB-0004yf-Kx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:59:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtPDs-0007iP-SS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40898 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtPDn-0007ei-2z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:59:00 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtPDg-000U1G-O2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:58:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:gQcs5MoH0JhJ4SHw81hOwgQBxKo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:119366 Archived-At: > The new text width only needs to be calculated once, so if I solve this with > a function in `window-size-change-functions', the function would need to > remove itself from that hook again. I guess it's feasible to call > remove-hook inside the function, right? It should work fine, yes. If not, please report it as a bug (and you can work around it by postponing the removal to some silly one-shot timer so it's removed from outside the function). Stefan