From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add new functions to mark/unmark/delete all bookmarks Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:07:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200724005105.11f85d5f@pineapple> <03f641b5-9ff9-476f-afab-e674e4027d27@default> <20200724110733.7cf5c4d5@pineapple> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Matthew White Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 24 17:08:51 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jyzJa-00055X-Pw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:08:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34142 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyzJZ-0005vk-Sy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyzIb-0005Gn-BB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:46440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyzIZ-0002UF-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E1B2C440773; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:07:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5DBB444049F; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:07:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1595603265; bh=aRQJhJni0h945lvZ71stvEnTC7G0CyYoN76AATh+h0Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=KEXFdQYXL8RV34M3nCIi3aVcx4jHY584/RVjotsmPbB6MUVrPud4GxJpGvKO3L+s8 KGxmIZmuyspoy2oi0arLU1zatKZm1QrJ2/IYpjuUuTau9ew124mZAcD0jdyAmUGGn/ bPHKc86gvmG7JACHHhsf9IAvyUFs4NdBF0Wsm5MYnEYdDTMdODRRk3H4giugza/4K+ eNEGh1XWEeK2TejSZtvOiOGJyRl22aWuLlHZrVyC5Dknsy0UK6MM1LN26nAklXCGjV 5i+eD3OK0E8nXDR0KsfFhcyxnSxwV6X5/vy1cchKA7W75zQiO+cOOYw/Yc+DpVfzL8 vXfU1w8TLAwMw== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [104.247.229.155]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2756E12059A; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:07:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20200724110733.7cf5c4d5@pineapple> (Matthew White's message of "Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:07:33 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/24 11:05:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253188 Archived-At: > I assure you that I never looked into the code of Bookmark+, hence > there is no code I borrowed in writing my patch to add some common > features to bookmark.el. I'm sorry if people think things that way. His code is covered by the GPL *and* he signed the copyright paperwork, so I don't think his issue is the reverse: he'd rather that the "new code" be taken from his to reduce the difference between bookmark.el and bookmark+.el. Stefan