From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: why is my cd command on eshell on Windows so slow? Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:41:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86r1jaqdia.fsf@protonmail.com> <83r1javyvo.fsf@gnu.org> <86sg3qouli.fsf@protonmail.com> <86sg3p6aal.fsf@protonmail.com> <86a6px5n7v.fsf@protonmail.com> <87r1j9dlsh.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14036"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:zphC75K45K3zYv6nN8PNnYn2iTY= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 17 16:41:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lXm8o-0003Yr-Fb for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:41:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXm8n-00013k-Jd for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:41:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXm8S-00013e-NE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:47974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXm8R-0004ba-De for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 10:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lXm8Q-0003Aa-0n for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:41:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:129021 Archived-At: > So the problem is fixed in master but not in emacs-27. Is it planned to > be backported to the later? Not currently, no. > It is a regression. I wouldn't mind backporting it to `emacs-27`, but you'd better ask Eli if he thinks it's worth the risk (he's the one who decides what is acceptable on the `emacs-27` branch). Stefan