From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add ftable.el to ELPA Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:56:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <875ywoibua.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <8735rrkq4p.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1074"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 03 14:57:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtza-000Ab7-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:57:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52152 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtzZ-0003YH-PQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:57:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtyE-0001kV-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:56:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:43078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mAtyB-0005xN-6t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 240814405BD; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:56:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C17AF440570; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:56:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1627995383; bh=IbE+bwFlsEVF7Illqq1RQS0fNgM3kav9p/TQfTQyscE=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DK/7/M2isY84LybZ9S963pOKHRAs4N7uhC38SE+1HlnaobzxRMVNQ9larPAisvVIS AgEBI7luf/Cem7UANizDOrqh5KuEqj7eBuM+Cg2u1zR4uXPni+Kg7mq8JFQav6FQ2O 6X9SdhJV9FpKas2tsVZxXSe0qD5aIatMke0ztvkAq2rZZVVQ/feieoNuQ+AbYg+v7q lVE8bhuOMXws42IzA5dJO+mrMJLLRxxq6hLqsk2ASqscTS748MClC2tuIRHQaKahoY PRZO51d8hG5/VCom3Psl0QkDfJOlwFGPVDLS8Xs8ecfk1jyBYY6hhIqPB2Nu6l0P6F YllGDNVSXdwkA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2C2712029C; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:56:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8735rrkq4p.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:18:30 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271971 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer [2021-08-03 08:18:30] wrote: >>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes: >> Stefan Kangas [2021-08-02 14:59:38] wrote: >>> Uwe Brauer writes: >>>> BTW, I did not know about your package, wouldn't it be a good idea, as a >>>> starting point to have it in MELPA, and then later move it to ELPA? >>> Why would that be a good idea? It seems better to me to put a useful >>> package on GNU ELPA, where it will reach more users. >> Indeed, GNU ELPA is not meant to be a retirement home, > Sorry for the misunderstanding. I had feeling that it is easier to get a > package included in MELPA than in ELPA. It is usually easier indeed for the reasons you cite, but that doesn't mean it gets easier later (the more you wait, the harder it gets to get the paperwork). In any case, the package under discussion had a sole author who had already signed the paperwork, so the package is now at http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ftable.html -- Stefan