From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5141234acf: Refactor the webp cache code to allow usage by gif_load, too Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:58:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <164967696186.12152.11548736665906939483@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220411113602.7A114C0581E@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87bkx73jfz.fsf@yahoo.com> <878rsbbxi0.fsf@gnus.org> <874k2z3hj8.fsf@yahoo.com> <8735ijbwk7.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40381"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Po Lu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 11 15:59:50 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ndua6-000AKa-Ka for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:59:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45282 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndua5-0008Dh-E3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:59:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nduYQ-0006SP-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:47303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nduYN-000649-TU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 710FF4407E1; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 367444407EB; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:58:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1649685481; bh=i8SB4spjaPdXIVf2XmGr760GSDzArBCfpe4tVhPybt8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FbqPfRXoT8+vSQYJIYOZu8jWsTuv3+IOy2LsDkPgOqpQdmjPi+YKQWV7XUcPEbBNW zCRdEY9+NBs0WSz0xHH57j+7y6w3Vw6O7EgjjxP+y/fcLPOXxjyPhJwxLuYL6FYPXK pzkMQRX/vFY2o3tPe3DVDrFyFOph930XkoZnDsY16kb6CJsgYAiA+ACzRiAvG3rnqY u7/lMZsg7ehX/xbOTTiscFjgdK5tuJ5z1hE6HVJqHJwdMoQV93HkgnbTmcqQVgMY72 OamOsJn0sAd7bZ9QVA1eoZjGRQ0wbtKgbzJYqLulPI+3nlAd7P5nHvGd+SkAO5xPWH pwxGbeN3oyYBQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F1E81203DA; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 09:58:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8735ijbwk7.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:04:40 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288205 Archived-At: > So I dunno. My only worry was that not gc-protecting it might lead to a > segfault somewhere. I think a call to `mark_object` is much cheaper than this discussion. Stefan