From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finalizers and incremental GC Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 08:16:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ee0672hg.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87ee0672hg.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39105"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 03 14:18:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nx6Fz-0009rj-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 14:18:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33804 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nx6Fx-0003js-TX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 08:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nx6E3-00028L-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 08:16:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:62767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nx6E0-0004ie-7A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 08:16:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8FFFD440F0D; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4DEA7440DBD; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:16:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1654258577; bh=t2DzLt0JWlg9HuCXYG4fvQX2K5c+nhs87Xlt9xAeKHs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y3Sabe0KqIqMLsWIA8NPyEdF2dWdv6VfrhdRxAfgQ8Y13aaJ1sdUzpnJDuB9ou5jz WuWesp7zrkEJgz0uDgsC6z6QvZGDbZF5deJfIPgnOw3Iej6XgjQ8cRrG2YtdEuxjxu O3S7Nq7W4twzmqaG+UA1AiDemBFyKMxQHWgVEj2QCeb5MHJ4gmLVDbTidKkBuhlBXm rEjakVYYjJz1cNahlkcXesqzGTqLgCwx8wKYl+Xe3FOrfsv9kjsjQsxuclE4AGWRAs 7CxqBy9iAxJu7GY5HxJOV6s5d1/zLRzs+Wu5XFqPwr9nHY9Fqp3v6CcEFTXxJqA7yD FZ7lE/jqWzJCg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D541120180; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:16:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ee0672hg.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Fri, 03 Jun 2022 13:14:19 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290615 Archived-At: > Would it make more sense to run all the finalizers at once, after all > white objects are swept and a garbage collection cycle completes, like > the current garbage collector? It shouldn't matter, so which ever is easiest or most efficient is probably the better option. A secondary concern is to run the finalizers as soon as possible. IOW, what you do now is probably the better option, Stefan