From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally' Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:33:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k5h28i23.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> <4849B3D7.6090809@gmx.at> <484A9CF4.2050603@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212863642 1223 80.91.229.12 (7 Jun 2008 18:34:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 18:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Hansen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 07 20:34:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K53FS-0008F6-1M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:34:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56418 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K53Ef-0008SU-1N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K53EZ-0008P6-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K53EY-0008Og-K8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55724 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K53EY-0008OW-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:22857 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K53EY-0003Pg-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:33:46 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvABAHZxSkjO+ISodGdsb2JhbACBVpAyASecSA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,605,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="22259095" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 07 Jun 2008 14:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.132.168]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id NYO89045; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3CF108864; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 14:33:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <484A9CF4.2050603@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:36:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98599 Archived-At: > Is the attached patch what you mean? That looks right, yes. Tho I'd keep 80 and 160 as defaults rather than nil (the horizontal 160 seems very safe, I'm not quite as sure about the vertical 80, but it seems OK for now). > There's yet no clever default for > handling the height/width aspect ratio. Not sure what you mean. Do you mean control the aspect ratio test, rather than use a hardcoded implicit 1? If so I think we can leave at that for now, it's not clear that it'll be needed anyway. Stefan