From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Willing to debug bug #3542 (23.0.94; File access via UNC path slow again under Windows) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:51:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7dbe73ed0907051401o26903ca3t9a67060f3a3417ad@mail.gmail.com> <83fxda1pef.fsf@gnu.org> <7dbe73ed0907060038w53699f77ie742996955ae8118@mail.gmail.com> <838wj11sz4.fsf@gnu.org> <83my7fz09s.fsf@gnu.org> <7dbe73ed0907081347q12dfd1a2lbbff915c49362f75@mail.gmail.com> <4A55D68D.8050407@gnu.org> <7dbe73ed0907090453s3e125b4ar142b90a268b105e2@mail.gmail.com> <7DAFC004A33C486A9E29A59689E7F02E@us.oracle.com> <4A5619F5.8010008@gnu.org> <8363e1zoak.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbxjrmue.fsf@gnu.org> <831voks97q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247532730 29013 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2009 00:52:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, mathias.dahl@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 14 02:52:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MQWFV-0006tb-CG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:52:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQWFU-0002dg-KH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:52:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQWFP-0002dE-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:51:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQWFJ-0002cH-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:51:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45097 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQWFJ-0002cE-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:51:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:10653 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MQWFG-0000lb-QY; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:51:46 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar0EABZzW0pMCpbp/2dsb2JhbACBUc1PhAkFhmo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,393,1243828800"; d="scan'208";a="41521929" Original-Received: from 76-10-150-233.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.150.233]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 13 Jul 2009 20:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7BCCD7EF7; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:51:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <831voks97q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:56:25 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112435 Archived-At: >> > Already done by today's commits to the trunk. The function is called >> > is_slow_fs, and returns non-zero if its argument resides on a >> > filesystem deemed slow. >> > I'm not sure this is what you want for file-remote-p. Perhaps you >> > only want files on remote (a.k.a. networked) filesystems. There's >> >> I'm not sure I understand the difference. Could you give an example of >> a filesystem that's slow but not "remote (a.k.a. networked)"? > The code in is_slow_fs considers only fixed disks and RAM disks not > ``slow''. Other types, which include CDs and removable media such as > USB memory sticks, are considered ``slow''. Hmm... removable media... I think it should still be considered as non-remote, although accessing a USB stick after you removed it (but without unmounting it) may hang just like accessing a dead NFS server. Stefan