From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: more reliable `make' Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:46:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20090907092823.GA3210@muc.de> <83ws4a3b49.fsf@gnu.org> <0C7A6FC6-085D-4B7F-9DC0-FF0493876153@raeburn.org> <15tyzeinlq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83skey34bz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252428438 22031 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2009 16:47:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 18:47:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ml3qY-0000Ay-MZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:47:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45869 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml3qY-0007Xm-9L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml3qS-0007Up-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml3qP-0007RQ-03 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50944 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ml3qO-0007RG-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41138) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ml3qI-0002Fk-Od; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n88Gkqrq013504; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B02723A8F3; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:46:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:43:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3358=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115137 Archived-At: > I'll wait to hear the details of Stefans's implementation, but I > imagine it was preferring the .el files only if newer. And only during byte-compilation, yes. Stefan